MPO Meeting Minutes
Draft Memorandum for the Record
Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Meeting
July 20, 2023, Meeting
10:00 AM–11:40 AM, Zoom Video Conferencing Platform
David Mohler, Chair, representing Gina Fiandaca, Secretary of Transportation and Chief Executive Officer of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT)
The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) agreed to the following:
See attendance on page 13.
D. Mohler stated that the ad hoc Memorandum of Understanding Committee will be chaired by the Inner Core Committee, City of Somerville (Tom Bent). The committee consists of the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) (Eric Bourassa), the Regional Transportation Advisory Council (Lenard Diggins), the MetroWest Regional Collaborative, City of Framingham (Dennis Giombetti), the MBTA Advisory Board (Brian Kane), the MassDOT Office of Transportation Planning (Derek Krevat), the City of Boston (Matthew Moran), and the MassDOT Highway Division (John Romano).
T. Teich stated that three new staff members joined the agency in July: Rounaq Basu as the Manager of Multimodal Planning and Design, Chandler Jong as a Data Scientist-Travel Demand Modeler, and Paris Charitatos as a Data Scientist-Travel Demand Modeler. T. Teich stated that two staff members will be leaving the agency in August. Open positions include the Manager of MPO Activities, two Senior Transportation Planners, and a Principal Analyst/Travel Demand Modeler.
T. Teich stated that staff participated in a peer exchange hosted by the MAPC and funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The peer exchange focused on investments in engaging diverse constituents and best practices for public engagement. Contact Sean Rourke (srourke@ctps.org) for more information.
Representative Christine Barber and Senator Pat Jehlen advocated for the inclusion of the Mystic Valley Parkway station on Route 16, part of the Green Line Extension Phase Two (GLX2) project, in the Destination 2050 LRTP. Rep. Barber stated that the MPO previously programmed $150 million for the station, but in 2016 the MPO decided to reallocate funds to support the implementation of the Green Line Extension Phase One project. Rep. Barber stated that when the MPO took this vote, then Secretary of Transportation Stephanie Pollack committed to bringing the GLX2 project through environmental permitting, which has not yet begun. Rep. Barber spoke of the regional support for the project.
D. Krevat stated that the UPWP Committee voted to recommend for the full MPO board to vote to endorse the FFY 2024 UPWP. The next meeting of the UPWP Committee will be on July 27, 2023, to discuss budgetary adjustments to the current FFY 2023 UPWP.
L. Diggins stated that the previous Advisory Council meeting was dedicated to drafting comment letters. There will be no meeting in August.
1. May 18, 2023, MPO Meeting Minutes (pdf) (html)
1. Transit Transformation Work Scope (pdf) (html)
· Enhance amenities for transit customers
· Improve accessibility of the transit system
· Increase capacity of transit stations and improve multimodal connections
· Make state-of-good-repair improvements to transit assets, including tracks, signals, and power systems
· Modernize transit fleets through the purchase of vehicles and upgrades to maintenance facilities
· Make investments in climate resiliency to support the future security of transit infrastructure, including system electrification
Objectives of the program are to review best practices at other MPOs and solicit feedback from stakeholders on potential projects to be funded, define the process for determining needs and evaluating projects, and recommend project types for funding in future TIPs.
In task one, staff will conduct a literature review and host workshops and meetings with the MPO board, Regional Transportation Advisory Council, and transit authorities. In task two, staff will develop a model for program administration and project evaluation criteria. In task three, staff will present the draft program to the board and lead a discussion. This feedback will be incorporated and presented to the board as the final Transit Transformation program.
M. Moran asked how staff plan to coordinate with municipalities and other stakeholders. L. Casey stated that municipality engagement will primarily occur in the Advisory Council workshop.
Ali Kleyman, MBTA, stated that it would be helpful to discuss the size and budget of projects within this program and challenges that occur when managing and administering low-budget projects.
A motion to approve the Transit Transformation work scope was made by the Regional Transportation Advisory Council (L. Diggins) and seconded by the MBTA Advisory Board (B. Kane). The motion carried.
1. Destination 2050 (pdf) (html)
2. Destination 2050 Appendices (html)
3. Summary of Public Comments (pdf) (html)
4. Compiled Public Comment Letters (pdf)
B. Putnam stated that the LRTP contains an overview of the document; vision, goals, and objectives; the structure of investment programs; funding allocations to respective programs; and recommended projects. The appendices contain information on public engagement activities, the universe of projects, an air quality analysis, a financial report, a system performance report, and a Transportation Equity performance report.
The public comment period was open from June 16, 2023, to July 16, 2023, when 18 written public comments and 67 verbal comments were received at in-person engagement events. Publicity methods included the MPO website, email lists, social media posts, direct outreach to stakeholders, and paper brochures in six languages. Public engagement events included meetings with the Regional Transportation Advisory Council, subregions, and advocacy groups. In-person events were held at locations including the Mattapan Farmers’ Market, Framingham Farmers’ Market, and Boston Open Streets. Themes of public comments included resilience, bicycles and pedestrians, projects and investment programs, and the equity analysis.
Staff requested the board vote to endorse the 2023 LRTP, Destination 2050.
Kenneth Miller, FHWA, suggested that the funding tables in the main document of the LRTP include information about all the federal funding dollars that flow through the MPO, instead of limiting the tables to the Regional Target funds that the MPO has discretion over. E. Bourassa added that it could be helpful to add an explanation of the formula funds for the region.
Brad Rawson, Inner Core Committee (City of Somerville), spoke of the public comment from Representative Barber and Senator Jehlen about the GLX2 project and the need to continue coalition building around the project and usher it through the environmental permitting process.
L. Diggins thanked those who provided public comments on the LRTP.
Steve Olanoff, Three Rivers Interlocal Council (TRIC), spoke about the Canton Interchange in the TRIC subregion and its importance to the region.
A motion to endorse the Destination 2050 LRTP was made by the MAPC (E. Bourassa) and seconded by the City of Newton (Josh Ostroff). The motion carried.
2. FFY 2024 UPWP Executive Summary (pdf) (html)
3. FFY 2024 UPWP Appendices (html)
S. Murthy stated that minor text edits were made to the document during the public comment period.
Staff requested the board vote to endorse the FFY 2024 UPWP.
A motion to endorse the FFY 2024 UPWP was made by the Regional Transportation Advisory Council (L. Diggins) and seconded by the MAPC (E. Bourassa). The motion carried.
1. FFYs 2023–27 TIP Amendment Eight (pdf) (html)
E. Lapointe stated that the FFYs 2023–27 TIP Amendment Eight proposes a cost increase and delay for Project #607342—Milton Intersection Improvements at Route 28 and Chickatawbut Road. No public comments were received during the public review period. Staff requested the board vote to endorse Amendment Eight.
A motion to endorse the FFYs 2023–27 TIP Amendment Eight was made by the MAPC (E. Bourassa) and seconded by the Regional Transportation Advisory Council (L. Diggins). The motion carried.
1. FFYs 2023–27 TIP Amendment Nine (pdf) (html)
E. Lapointe stated that the FFYs 2023–27 TIP Amendment Nine proposes programming of FFY 2023 Community Project Funding to support electric vehicle charging infrastructure in Cambridge. No comments were received during the 21-day public review period.
Staff requested the board vote to endorse Amendment Nine.
A motion to endorse the FFYs 2023–27 TIP Amendment Nine was made by the Three Rivers Interlocal Council (Steve Olanoff, Town of Norwood) and seconded by the MAPC (E. Bourassa). The motion carried.
1. FFYs 2023–27 TIP Amendment 10 (pdf) (html)
2. Amendment 10 Van Classifications (pdf) (html)
E. Lapointe stated that FFYs 2023–27 TIP Amendment Ten proposes programming of the FFY 2023 MassDOT Community Transit Grant awards for Program Vehicles, found in Table 1. Staff requested that the board vote to waive the public comment period for Amendment Ten. A waived comment period is required to endorse Amendment Ten by August 3, 2023, to obligate Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding before fiscal books close.
Table 1
MassDOT SFY 2023 Community Transit Grant Program Vehicle Awards
Awardee |
Description |
Budget |
CATA |
Procurement of six LF vans at $186,656 per van |
$1,119,936 |
MWRTA |
Procurement of three replacement type E vans |
$318,000 |
MWRTA |
Procurement of two Ford E-Transit electric cargo vans |
$211,396 |
SCM Community Transportation |
Procurement of replacement type E van |
$106,000 |
SCM Community Transportation |
Procurement of a replacement type E2A van |
$116,700 |
Cohasset Elder Affairs |
Purchase of replacement van |
$106,000 |
Hingham COA |
Purchase of replacement van |
$186,656 |
Marblehead |
Procurement of a replacement type A van |
$78,604 |
Marblehead |
Procurement of a replacement type E van |
$106,000 |
Medfield COA |
Procurement of a replacement type A van |
$78,604 |
Medfield COA |
Procurement of a replacement type Cb van |
$113,500 |
Upham’s Corner Health Committee |
Purchase of a 30-foot bus |
$212,000 |
Upham’s Corner Health Committee |
Purchase of a less than 30-foot bus for service expansion |
$106,000 |
Revere |
Procurement of a replacement van |
$121,000 |
Hull COA |
Procurement of a replacement type E van |
$121,000 |
Randolph |
Purchase of a replacement van |
$121,000 |
Manchester |
Replacement of a van with an electric van |
$105,698 |
Manchester |
Procurement of a replacement E2B van |
$111,000 |
CATA = Cape Ann Transportation Authority. COA = Council on Aging. MWRTA = MetroWest Regional Transit Authority. SCM = Somerville, Cambridge, Medford. SFY = State Fiscal Year.
L. Diggins asked why the amendment was presented in a timeline that necessitates the public review period to be waived. E. Lapointe stated that the grants were programmed under the assumption that FTA books would be closed closer to the end of August or September, leading to a shortened timeline. D. Krevat stated that the timing of this TIP amendment is reliant on the MassDOT Rail and Transit Division’s timing, as grant programming decisions are made by the division. D. Mohler stated that there are many processes that need to occur for FTA funding to be obligated to projects, leading to books closing early. Leah Sirmin, FTA, stated that projects must be included in the State TIP for grants to begin to be obligated and that the grant funds in the Community Transit Grant Program are lapsing at the end of FFY 2023.
Vote
A motion to waive the public review period and endorse the FFYs 2023–27 TIP
Amendment 10 was made by the City of Newton (J. Ostroff) and seconded by the
Regional Transportation Advisory Council (L. Diggins). The motion carried.
1. FFYs 2023–27 TIP Amendment 11 (pdf) (html)
E. Lapointe stated that the FFYs 2023–27 TIP Amendment 11 proposes the following:
· Cost increases for three FFY 2023 Statewide Highway projects and one Regional Target project
· Programming of two design earmarks in Marblehead and Brookline
· Deprogramming of anticipated MetroWest Regional Transit Authority (MWRTA) Section 5339 Discretionary Grant line items
Project #608889, Framingham–Traffic Signal Installation at Edgell Road at Central Street, was originally budgeted for $2,484,704 under a Regional Target program, the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funding program. The budget has increased by $625,411, which will be funded using Statewide Highway funding in the Transportation Alternatives Program.
Table 2
FFY 2023 Statewide Highway Funds
Project ID and Name |
Funding Source |
Current Budget |
New Budget |
Explanation |
608009: Boxborough – Bridge Replacement, B-18-002, Route 111 over I-495 |
HIP-BR |
$12,763,392 |
$29,304,478 |
The budget for this project has increased following the advancing of project design and identification of additional needs for the structure. The original cost estimate for this project, and the one currently reflected in the FFYs 2023–27 TIP, was initially developed in 2014. |
609254: Lynn – Intersection Improvements at Two Intersections on Broadway |
HSIP |
$5,413,401 |
$6,059,056 |
The budget for this project is being revised to reflect the latest design estimate. |
608255: Stow– Bridge Replacement, S-29-011, Box Mill Road over Elizabeth Brook |
STBG-BR-Off |
$3,454,408 |
$4,250,386 |
The budget for this project is increasing to accommodate additional design elements meant to restore the streambed and embankments of the river. |
BR-Off = Off-System Bridge. FFY = Federal Fiscal Year. HIP-BR = Highway Investment Program, Bridge. HSIP = Highway Safety Improvement Program. STBG = Surface Transportation Block Grant.
Table 3
FFY 2023 Earmark Discretionary Funds
Project ID and Name |
Change Type |
Funding Source |
Budget |
Explanation |
S12758: Marblehead – Border to Boston Trail Design |
New Project |
Earmark |
$175,000 |
This line item programs part of a federal earmark obtained through FFY 2022 Congressionally Directed Spending for designing the Border to Boston Trail. |
S12849: Brookline – Beacon Street Bridle Path Project Design |
New Project |
Earmark |
$2,500,000 |
This line item programs a $2,000,000 FFY 2023 Community Project Funding request to design the reopening and restoration of Fredrick Law Olmsted and John Charles’ original design for Beacon Street to incorporate a two-way multi-use path for 2.3 miles of the roadway. |
FFY = Federal Fiscal Year.
Table 4
FFY 2023 Transit Program—MWRTA
Project Name |
Change Type |
Former Budget |
RTD0011113: MWRTA – Competitive Revenue Vehicle Replacement |
Remove Project |
$585,200 |
RTD0011127: MWRTA – Back Entrance Project |
Remove Project |
$2,000,000 |
RTD0011129: MWRTA – Cochituate Rail Trail North Framingham Feasibility Study |
Remove Project |
$95,000 |
FFY = Federal Fiscal Year.
A motion to release the FFYs 2023–27 TIP Amendment 11 for its 21-day public review period was made by the MAPC (E. Bourassa) and seconded by the MBTA Advisory Board (B. Kane). The motion carried.
E. Lapointe stated that the FFYs 2023–27 TIP Adjustment Four proposes one cost increase and source change for Project #610674, Newton—Reconstruction of Commonwealth Avenue (Route 30), from East of Auburn Street to Ash Street. The budget for the project has increased by $258,001 to reflect the latest cost estimate. The project funding sources have been adjusted to include Transportation Alternatives Program funding.
J. Ostroff stated that this project is part of an emerging shared-use path along Route 30.
A motion to endorse the FFYs 2023–27 TIP Adjustment Four was made by the City of Newton (J. Ostroff) and seconded by the MAPC (E. Bourassa). The motion carried.
1. Operations Plan (pdf) (html)
2. Communication Norms (pdf) (html)
T. Teich stated that the Operations Plan and Communication Norms were presented to the board for review on June 15, 2023. T. Teich reviewed changes made to the document in response to comments and suggestions received. On page seven, the rules of a majority vote are clarified. Page eight has a clarification of the vice chair election process.
T. Teich stated that feedback received at the previous meeting discussed the MPO member election process for municipal representation. The MBTA Advisory Board and MAPC, responsible for conducting elections, noted that the election process recently changed and decided to evaluate its effectiveness within this context once one full round of elections have occurred, which is three election cycles.
If the Operations Plan is approved, an appendix will be added with an annual timeline of key events to incorporate into the agenda-setting process. The Communication Norms, if approved, will be finalized and all members, designees, and alternatives will be asked for signatures of receipt.
D. Mohler asked if the draft Operations Plan authorizes the MPO to offer the Executive Director a multiyear employment agreement. T. Teich stated that the Operations Plan outlines potential options to consider but does not specify which option to pursue. D. Mohler asked which agency would be the contractor in the case of an employment agreement. T. Teich stated that additional research would need to be done if the board decided to pursue this option and added that the document has undergone a legal review to identify violations of legal requirements.
A motion to approve the MPO Operations Plan was made by the MBTA Advisory Board (B. Kane) and seconded by the MAPC (E. Bourassa). The motion carried.
D. Mohler asked what the process is if there is a reported violation of the communication norms. T. Teich stated the reporting section of the document contains steps to report violations to the chair or vice-chair of the MPO to be investigated. They will then meet with the individual violating the norms. Potential consequences of repeated violations are outlined in the document.
A motion to approve the MPO Communication Norms was made by the MAPC (E. Bourassa) and seconded by the MBTA Advisory Board (B. Kane). The motion carried.
B. Rawson congratulated members of the staff and Administration and Finance Committee for their work on the Operations Plan and Communication Norms.
A motion to adjourn was made by the MAPC (E. Bourassa) and seconded by the City of Newton (J. Ostroff). The motion carried.
Members |
Representatives and Alternates |
At-Large City (City of Everett) |
|
At-Large City (City of Newton) |
Josh Ostroff |
At-Large Town (Town of Arlington) |
John Alessi |
At-Large Town (Town of Brookline) |
Rob King |
City of Boston (Boston Planning & Development Agency) |
Jim Fitzgerald |
City of Boston (Boston Transportation Department) |
Matt Moran Jen Rowe |
Federal Highway Administration |
Kenneth Miller Cassandra Ostrander |
Federal Transit Administration |
Leah Sirmin |
Inner Core Committee (City of Somerville) |
Tom Bent Brad Rawson |
Massachusetts Department of Transportation |
David Mohler John Bechard |
MassDOT Highway Division |
John Romano |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) |
Ali Kleyman |
Massachusetts Port Authority |
Sarah Lee |
MBTA Advisory Board |
Brian Kane |
Metropolitan Area Planning Council |
Eric Bourassa |
MetroWest Regional Collaborative (City of Framingham) |
Dennis Giombetti |
Minuteman Advisory Group on Interlocal Coordination (Town of Acton) |
Kristen Guichard |
North Shore Task Force (City of Beverly) |
Darlene Wynne |
North Suburban Planning Council (Town of Burlington) |
|
Regional Transportation Advisory Council |
Lenard Diggins |
South Shore Coalition (Town of Hull) |
|
South West Advisory Planning Committee (Town of Medway) |
|
Three Rivers Interlocal Council (Town of Norwood) |
Steve Olanoff |
Other Attendees |
Affiliation |
Karl Allen |
City of Chelsea |
Fahran Bajaj |
|
Representative Christine Barber |
34th Middlesex District |
Ross Bloom |
Revvit Inc. |
Sarah Bradbury |
MassDOT District 3 |
Miranda Briseño |
MassDOT |
Johannes Epke |
Conservation Law Foundation |
Seth Gadbois |
|
Joy Glynn |
MetroWest Regional Transit Authority (MWRTA) |
Matt Hartman |
|
Senator Pat Jehlen |
Second Middlesex District |
Sandy Johnston |
MBTA |
Chris Klem |
MassDOT |
Josh Klingenstein |
MBTA |
Raissah Kouame |
MassDOT |
Derek Krevat |
MassDOT |
Jackie LaFlam |
Cape Ann Transportation Authority |
Owen MacDonald |
Town of Weymouth |
Benjamin Muller |
MassDOT District 6 |
Jim Nee |
MWRTA |
Sheila Page |
Town of Lexington |
Cheryll-Ann Senior |
MassDOT District 5 |
Jon Seward |
MoveMassachusetts |
Derek Shooster |
MassDOT |
Pat Sullivan |
|
Tyler Terrasi |
MWRTA |
Frank Tramontozzi |
|
Myles Tucker |
Town of Needham |
Julia Wallerce |
MAPC |
Chandler (full name not provided) |
|
Rebecca (full name not provided) |
MPO Staff/Central Transportation Planning Staff |
Tegin Teich, Executive Director |
Logan Casey |
Annette Demchur |
Hiral Gandhi |
Betsy Harvey |
Marnie Kopec |
Ethan Lapointe |
Erin Maguire |
Marty Milkovits |
Srilekha Murthy |
Meghan O'Connor |
Gina Perille |
Sarah Philbrick |
Bradley Putnam |
Judy Taylor |
Sam Taylor |
The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) operates its programs, services, and activities in compliance with federal nondiscrimination laws including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and related statutes and regulations. Title VI prohibits discrimination in federally assisted programs and requires that no person in the United States of America shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin (including limited English proficiency), be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity that receives federal assistance. Related federal nondiscrimination laws administered by the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or both, prohibit discrimination on the basis of age, sex, and disability. The Boston Region MPO considers these protected populations in its Title VI Programs, consistent with federal interpretation and administration. In addition, the Boston Region MPO provides meaningful access to its programs, services, and activities to individuals with limited English proficiency, in compliance with U.S. Department of Transportation policy and guidance on federal Executive Order 13166. The Boston Region MPO also complies with the Massachusetts Public Accommodation Law, M.G.L. c 272 sections 92a, 98, 98a, which prohibits making any distinction, discrimination, or restriction in admission to, or treatment in a place of public accommodation based on race, color, religious creed, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, disability, or ancestry. Likewise, the Boston Region MPO complies with the Governor's Executive Order 526, section 4, which requires that all programs, activities, and services provided, performed, licensed, chartered, funded, regulated, or contracted for by the state shall be conducted without unlawful discrimination based on race, color, age, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, religion, creed, ancestry, national origin, disability, veteran's status (including Vietnam-era veterans), or background. A complaint form and additional information can be obtained by contacting the MPO or at http://www.bostonmpo.org/mpo_non_discrimination. To request this information in a different language or in an accessible format, please contact Title VI Specialist By Telephone: For people with hearing or speaking difficulties, connect through the state MassRelay service: · Relay Using TTY or Hearing Carry-over: 800.439.2370 · Relay Using Voice Carry-over: 866.887.6619 · Relay Using Text to Speech: 866.645.9870 For more information, including numbers for Spanish speakers, visit https://www.mass.gov/massrelay. |